Email Newsletter Publishing Strategies  
Search In Epub



EPUB Archives

[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread]

[epub] Re: New MI and UT email compliance laws, July 1st enacted
At 08:40 PM 7/2/05, you wrote:
My preference? Get an opinion letter from the Federal Trade
Commission confirming what I believe is correct, that these
two laws are void on there face, having been superseded by
the CAN SPAM Act of 2003. They are null and not law.

Why? Then you have a good faith defense to any MI or Utah
State or private action attempts to enforce these laws.

The only problem with this, John, is that an opinion letter from the Federal Trade Commission won't carry either the judicial or legislative authority to overturn the law. The FTC might be of the opinion that these two laws are questionable or even invalid, but will they file suit? That's what's going to be needed here -- taking the thing before a judge to get an injunction to stop enforcement and, ultimately, to have the laws thrown out as unconstitutional and/or superceded by CAN-SPAM.

And maybe I'm wrong, maybe the FTC would file suit against the governments of MI and UT ... personally, I think it would pay to notify both agencies (Advocacy and the FTC). It wouldn't hurt if you had the two of them throwing hissy fits at these two state legislatures at the same time.


Dawn Rivers Baker Editor/Publisher

The MicroEnterprise Journal
Where the nation's business meets microbusiness.
P.O. Box 41
Sidney, NY 13838

[Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread]

Thread Index